How Can You Ensure the Long-Term Reliability of Your Asset Data?
Preserving infrastructure knowledge throughout its lifecycle. Plans, topographic surveys, geographic information system (GIS) data, georeferenced photographs, as-built documentation, technical attributes, intervention histories… As construction and maintenance operations progress, infrastructure generates an increasing amount of data. This information is essential. It tells us where assets are located, how they were built, what changes have been made and under what conditions future interventions can be carried out. But its lifespan extends far beyond that of the project that produced it. Data acquired today may be used several years later, by another team, another service provider or with new tools. In the meantime, the physical assets themselves may also have changed: a network may have been relocated, a road redesigned, equipment replaced or new infrastructure created. This is where the challenge lies: how can reliable and usable knowledge of infrastructure be preserved over time? This challenge concerns all stakeholders who produce, use or transmit infrastructure information: local authorities, utility operators and network managers, contractors and works service providers, engineering firms and surveyors, as well as industrial and sensitive sites. They do not all use data in the same way. Some produce it in the field, others process and transmit it, while others need to use it and keep it up to date over time. But they all depend on the same thing: being able to retrieve reliable information, understand where it comes from and know how far they can trust it. A wealth of data, but knowledge that can become less reliable The problem is not a lack of data. On the contrary, organisations have been accumulating it for years. However, it comes from multiple sources: detection operations, survey campaigns, successive construction projects, as-built plans, maintenance operations, engineering firms, contractors, surveyors, internal departments and utility operators. Methods and tools also evolve. Software changes, information systems migrate, formats succeed one another, and service providers and teams change. Over time, some information is re-entered or moved. Other information is no longer updated. Some data loses its link to the documents or surveys from which it was produced. Other information may simply be lost. Meanwhile, the infrastructure itself continues to evolve. Gradually, a gap can emerge between the actual state of the assets and the knowledge available to document them. Preserving data reliability therefore means not only retaining its context, but also being able to incorporate new information produced during successive interventions so that knowledge of the assets continues to evolve with them. The issue is therefore not simply having data available. It is also being able to determine whether that data accurately reflects reality and whether it can be trusted. When data loses its context, it loses part of its value Imagine a network represented in a GIS. Its position may appear perfectly usable. Yet several years after it was acquired, certain questions become essential: When was this data produced? Which survey was it based on? Which method was used, and with what level of accuracy? Which service provider or team produced it? Which intervention or project version does it correspond to? Are there photographs, surveys or documents that can be used to verify it? If this information is no longer available, it becomes difficult to assess how much confidence can be placed in the data. The consequences are very tangible: document searches, contacting former stakeholders, additional field checks, or even new network detection or location operations. When the available mapping no longer makes it possible to locate an asset with sufficient accuracy, additional investigations or location operations may indeed become necessary. These interventions can represent a significant additional cost for the stakeholders involved, with responsibility for those costs varying depending on the type of investigation and the context in which it is carried out. These costs are compounded by delays, new survey campaigns and, in some cases, decisions made on the basis of information whose reliability remains uncertain. Reliable asset data is therefore not simply accurate data. It is data whose origin, context and history remain understandable over time. This is the core challenge of traceability. Data that must remain reliable from one stakeholder to another Data accompanies infrastructure through different stages of its lifecycle. Uses and responsibilities vary depending on the stakeholders involved, but everyone has an interest in preserving its quality and continuity. For a local authority, the challenge is to build and maintain reliable asset databases despite successive interventions, changes in service providers or changes in teams and departments. This knowledge of utility networks helps prepare future projects, monitor completed works and support planning decisions with reliable, up-to-date information. The challenge today is to ensure that this knowledge, centralised in geographic information systems, remains complete, current and traceable over time. For a utility operator or network manager, the challenge is to maintain reliable, up-to-date knowledge of assets in order to secure interventions, plan works and monitor the evolution of the infrastructure over time. Collecting, structuring and updating field information makes it possible to build an asset database that can be used in GIS and shared between different departments and service providers. For a contractor or works service provider, one of the main challenges is to document field interventions accurately and ensure the continuity of that information through to the office and the project owner. Traceability of interventions, reliable as-built surveys and the sharing of field data make it possible to verify that work has been carried out correctly, limit information gaps and provide reliable documentation for future interventions. For an engineering firm and its surveyors, the challenge is to use data collected in the field efficiently and maintain its reliability through to the production and delivery of final deliverables. Better continuity between the field and the office reduces duplicate data entry and information gaps, facilitates data checking and enables clients to receive accurate, documented and directly usable information. For an industrial or sensitive site, having reliable and up-to-date knowledge of utility networks is directly linked to intervention safety and service continuity. Incomplete or outdated mapping can expose teams to risk,
How Can You Ensure the Long-Term Reliability of Your Asset Data? Read Post »
