Expertise

GNSS – Understanding the Foundations of Satellite Positioning

GNSS positioning is used in many professional applications, including surveying, civil engineering, and utility network management. It relies on satellite constellations and complex calculation methods to determine an accurate position. Here’s a breakdown of how GNSS systems work and the common causes of accuracy degradation. GNSS: Beyond GPS The term “GPS” is often mistakenly used to refer to all satellite positioning technologies. In reality, GPS is just one of the available systems. The correct term is GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System), which encompasses all active satellite constellations: GPS (USA) GLONASS (Russia) GALILEO (European Union) BEIDOU (China) Some regions also benefit from complementary regional systems, such as QZSS in Japan. Principles of Position Calculation A GNSS receiver calculates its position based on the measured distance between itself and several satellites. Each satellite continuously broadcasts a signal containing precise time information. By measuring the time it takes for the signal to reach the receiver, the distance can be determined. This process is known as trilateration. To compute a full position (latitude, longitude, altitude) and correct the receiver’s clock bias, at least four satellites are required. Using multiple constellations increases the number of visible satellites, thereby improving the accuracy and reliability of the positioning. Contents of GNSS Signals Each satellite transmits a signal composed of several elements. These signal structures are defined in the official GPS system specification, IS-GPS-200, published by the United States Department of Defense: Navigation data: includes orbital parameters and clock corrections. What are ephemeris data used for? Ephemeris data are orbital parameters transmitted by each GNSS satellite within its navigation messages. They describe the satellite’s trajectory over a given period and are essential for the receiver to compute the satellite’s exact position at the time the signal was transmitted. There are two main types: Broadcast ephemeris, calculated by GNSS control centers and transmitted in real time within the satellite signals. Precise ephemeris, produced by organizations such as the IGS (International GNSS Service), used in applications requiring high accuracy, especially for post-processing. An error in the ephemeris data can result in positioning errors of several meters. Their quality is therefore a critical factor in any precise GNSS computation. Precise ephemerides are particularly provided by institutions like the IGS, which supplies reference orbital and timing data used in PPP (Precise Point Positioning) solutions. Pseudo-Random Noise (PRN) code: allows identification of the satellite and calculation of the signal travel time. Carrier wave: a radio-frequency signal that carries the other data. The satellite–receiver distance can be calculated in two ways: Using the PRN code, with meter-level accuracy. Using the carrier phase, which provides centimeter-level accuracy, but requires complex processing to resolve ambiguities (such as cycle slips and the integer number of cycles). Understanding Carrier Phase Ambiguity Measuring the phase of a carrier wave allows for much higher accuracy than code-based positioning. However, it comes with a particular challenge: the receiver can measure the received phase, but does not know the exact number of whole cycles traveled between the satellite and itself. This is known as carrier phase ambiguity. To convert the measurement into an absolute distance, the ambiguity must be “resolved,” meaning the correct number of full cycles must be estimated. This step is critical in positioning techniques like RTK (Real-Time Kinematic) or PPP (Precise Point Positioning), where the accuracy directly depends on the quality of ambiguity resolution. An incorrect ambiguity “fix” results in a systematic error that can reach several centimeters or more. That’s why high-end receivers include advanced algorithms capable of detecting, modeling, and correcting these uncertainties. Ambiguity resolution is extensively documented in the literature, notably in the Springer Handbook of GNSS (Teunissen & Montenbruck, 2017), a key reference on the topic. Main Sources of GNSS Errors Several factors affect positioning accuracy. Errors may arise from: From the satellites: Clock errors: although satellites are equipped with atomic clocks, even tiny drifts can cause positioning errors of several meters. Orbital errors: discrepancies exist between the satellite’s theoretical position and its actual position. From the atmosphere: Ionospheric delay: caused by charged particles in the upper atmosphere; it varies with solar activity. Tropospheric delay: caused by humidity and pressure in the lower layers of the atmosphere. From the receiver: Internal clock drift Local environment errors: such as multipath effects, obstructions, and interference. Cycle slips: an intermittent but critical source of error A cycle slip is a sudden disruption in the tracking of a carrier phase signal by a GNSS receiver. This typically occurs when a temporary obstacle (such as a vehicle, building, or vegetation) blocks or disturbs the signal, even momentarily. When the signal is reacquired, the receiver resumes phase tracking, but the previous ambiguity is no longer valid—it must be re-estimated. If this detection is poorly handled, it can result in an invisible but long-lasting error. High-performance receivers, such as Proteus, are equipped with automatic cycle slip detection mechanisms and can restart ambiguity resolution algorithms accordingly. Effective handling of cycle slips is critical in complex environments such as urban areas, forests, or cluttered construction sites. Signal processing accuracy: depends on the quality of the hardware and the algorithms used.   Type of error Origin Order of magnitude Satellite clock drift Space segment Up to 3 meters Orbital error Space segment ±2.5 meters Ionospheric delay Atmosphere (50–1000 km) 5 to 50 meters Tropospheric delay Atmosphere (0–12 km) 2 to 10 meters Multipath Receiver / Environment Variable (meters) Internal measurement noise Receiver Centimeter to decimeter level Improving Accuracy: GNSS Corrections To achieve centimeter-level accuracy, GNSS positioning must be corrected. Several techniques exist depending on the use case and operating conditions: RTK (Real-Time Kinematic) and NRTK (Network RTK): use one or more fixed reference stations to provide real-time correction data. The differential correction data are usually transmitted in the RTCM 10403.3 format, a widely adopted standard in professional GNSS systems. Base/Rover: involves a mobile base station that sends corrections to a rover in real time. This method requires solid surveying knowledge for proper setup. PPP (Precise Point Positioning): uses mathematical models to correct various error

GNSS – Understanding the Foundations of Satellite Positioning Read Post »

Securing Construction Sites and Stakeout Marking: The Challenges of Working Near Utility Networks

Understanding the Challenges of Working Near Utility Networks Work near underground utility networks involves significant risks. Team safety, meeting deadlines, regulatory compliance… the challenges are numerous and critical. At Syslor, we support field professionals on a daily basis — including public works companies, engineering firms, network operators, local authorities, and industrial players. Protecting Teams: A Vital Imperative Too Many Human Risks Still Persist Every project involving utility networks puts people’s safety on the line. Machinery, trenches, cables, and pipelines expose your teams to real dangers. Damage to networks and location errors are common causes of serious — sometimes fatal — accidents, especially when working near gas pipelines or high-voltage cables. The Importance of Stakeout Marking Accurate stakeout marking and access to reliable plans are the first lines of defense. With intuitive tools, even non-tech-savvy personnel can work safely without compromising alertness. Coordination between surveyors, site managers, and project owners is essential to ensure smooth and secure operations. Preventing Damage to Utility Infrastructure Without precise network location, excavation can lead to serious damage — especially to gas pipelines. Stakeout marking then becomes a critical issue, requiring accuracy, coordination, and the right tools to minimize errors. Maintaining markings throughout the duration of the project is often underestimated, yet it helps prevent delays and unexpected costs. Staying on Schedule and Minimizing Costs Any delay affects user services — water, electricity, internet, and more. Proper anticipation, with up-to-date data and precise stakeout marking, helps reduce costs, minimize disruptions, and speed up service restoration. Better Asset Management to Prepare for the Future For local authorities, having an accurate utility network reference is a powerful asset. Reliable network mapping makes urban planning easier and helps prevent costly surprises. Complying with Regulatory Requirements Working near utility networks involves strict safety and damage prevention rules. For contractors and project owners, it is essential to ensure that every operation complies with applicable procedures — from site preparation to execution. Comprehensive documentation, reliable network location, and precise stakeout marking are key to ensuring both compliance and safety for all parties involved. In summary Secure your worksites, prevent damage, stay on schedule, and meet regulatory requirements — these are the challenges we help you tackle with field tools designed for real-world conditions. You have expectations, we have solutions. Discover how Syslor can support you: Explore our solutions

Securing Construction Sites and Stakeout Marking: The Challenges of Working Near Utility Networks Read Post »

How to process and exploit point clouds effectively?

Photogrammetry has become an essential technique for documenting and analyzing construction sites, particularly in the context of as-built surveys of underground networks.It enables the production of georeferenced deliverables in various forms, such as point clouds, orthophotos, digital terrain models (DTMs), or even 3D meshes. Photogrammetric deliverables can be difficult to leverage due to the complexity of the data and the analyses required.Fortunately, some software tools—such as EASYMAP®—accessible through our web portal, greatly simplify this process, making these deliverables far more accessible to non-expert users. Let’s explore the practical applications of data collected using as-built tools like EasyScan®. Solutions for leveraging data collected through as-built surveys Vector mapping of utility networks Combining orthophotography with a digital terrain model (DTM) enables vertical projection, making it easy, fast, and accurate to vectorize the upper generatrices in 3D. This vectorization can be exported in various formats, allowing it to be used and integrated into Geographic Information Systems (GIS) or Computer-Aided Design (CAD) software, ensuring smooth interoperability between all project stakeholders. Example of upper generatrix tracing of an electrical network using Sysmap Handling longitudinal and cross-sectional profiles This vectorization comes with the ability to generate longitudinal and cross-sectional profiles, enabling continuous control of the tracing process. This ensures tracing reliability that meets the accuracy requirements of Class A. Profiles based on an electrical duct Longitudinal profile Cross-sectional profile Profiles produced with Sysmap Area measurement and cut/fill volume computation The drawing interface allows users to measure the surface areas of intervention zones, making it possible to directly assess excavated areas and optimize land use.This surface also serves as the basis for precise volumetric measurements.The Sysmap solution helps optimize earthwork costs by providing accurate resource estimates and ensuring project compliance. Area and volume computations using Sysmap Depth measurement of utility networks During network as-built surveys, photogrammetric deliverables make it possible to determine the depth of vectorized vertices from a reference surface — a crucial element for: Ensuring compliance with safety and utility location standards; Improving the quality of as-built plans by providing accurate data on pipeline burial depths. Detection of unusual depth values using Sysmap Photogrammetric deliverables go far beyond simple visualization: they enable the extraction of numerous precise measurements—vectorization, surface area, volume, depth—making them true decision-support tools for site managers and agency directors.They enhance as-built survey accuracy, optimize costs, and contribute to better management of underground infrastructure. With Sysmap—our tracing module designed to leverage photogrammetric deliverables—network tracing is performed with precision.This process ensures reliable, usable data that is essential for future projects: building asset records, reducing damage to infrastructure, saving time, and optimizing upcoming interventions. By combining high-quality surveys with dedicated tools like Sysmap, photogrammetric deliverables become true management assets—enabling more efficient and better-anticipated construction projects.

How to process and exploit point clouds effectively? Read Post »

Scroll to Top